The father and the teacher convey the "food" but unlike the nourishment of the mother who has a relationship of power, possession, because with this it keeps the child through guilt, threatening not to go it alone, it could not remove her from the feeding of the father / teacher is expressing what he is leaving the other free to continue on their path (later, we saw all that it is not, at least not by all the teachers ... my comment).
The teacher / father "shows the direction, leads to faith, but there must be the responsibility of the child / student to go in that direction. This
parallel parent / teacher is reinforced by the emergence of the founder that "When in history has been disappearing for a father figure, has suffered the same fate as the figure of the teacher, because they both belong to the same world. To resign live in a society without a father / teacher, is to resign ourselves to live in a society without God. "
In summary, the father is the one who returns to his son freedom from the world of matter-IA and gives the child a sense of identity. In this way, it helps to overcome the sense of loneliness and separation (induced by the mother) by returning the child a sense of belonging to a group project where the individual feels part of the will of the whole.
He helps to re-open consciousness. When consciousness is closed, it was the mere executors of programs: one belongs in every way to the world of automatic. This concept of "energy auto" comes from the theoretical substrate that was produced when the seminars and the teachers were still called "reiki". If you care, it is a concept that we can investigate further.
-more-
Tiresias
0 comments:
Post a Comment